Seriously? They should receive special treatment because 19 is too young to understand that raping a child is wrong? Is that all his argument? Is that even a morally defensible position? More importantly, is that intellectually defensible when speaking about a 19 year old intellectual capacity? I mean, it's not as if intellectual honesty was overabundant, what with Eiji's sister's friend professing to be 'both' a fervent catholic and a libertine, but is he seriously telling me that they deserve leniency because 19 is too young to know better, when the ob<x>ject that is being discussed is serial gang rape of innocent children? At 18/19, you are a man. A young man, but an adult nonetheless. If you are about to enter college, you cannot clam that 'diminished mental capacity' should enti<x>tle you to special treatment. You should be more than old enough to distinguish right from wrong -and, apart from that, serial rape of children is hardly a nuance that stems from a misconception about what "right" and "wrong" means: if "that" is something you want, then there is little doubt about the kind of sick and twisted character you have: you are not at all misguided, you are wicked-.
The only consolation is that we didn't see the last guy surviving. I would have been much more relieved if the old guy had at least managed to complete his quest. Simply put, the guys in question were more revolting than most of the serial killers encountered up until this point. This because they were perfectly lucid and conscious of what they were doing, not acting out of trauma. And also because what they did to that girl was much worse than simply killing her (it might have been almost an act of mercy): they destroyed her physically and emotionally, all the while laughing and jocking, and led her to plead to be left go, then to be left to die, then to kill herself, to be torn apart, to be physically shredded to pieces).
FACEBOOK COMMENTS MANGA HERE COMMENTS Newest Oldest Popular
Visitor2013-04-14 01:13
Seriously? They should receive special treatment because 19 is too young to understand that raping a child is wrong? Is that all his argument? Is that even a morally defensible position? More importantly, is that intellectually defensible when speaking about a 19 year old intellectual capacity? I mean, it's not as if intellectual honesty was overabundant, what with Eiji's sister's friend professing to be 'both' a fervent catholic and a libertine, but is he seriously telling me that they deserve leniency because 19 is too young to know better, when the ob<x>ject that is being discussed is serial gang rape of innocent children? At 18/19, you are a man. A young man, but an adult nonetheless. If you are about to enter college, you cannot clam that 'diminished mental capacity' should enti<x>tle you to special treatment. You should be more than old enough to distinguish right from wrong -and, apart from that, serial rape of children is hardly a nuance that stems from a misconception about what "right" and "wrong" means: if "that" is something you want, then there is little doubt about the kind of sick and twisted character you have: you are not at all misguided, you are wicked-.
Like(0)Reply
Visitor2013-04-13 01:42
The only consolation is that we didn't see the last guy surviving. I would have been much more relieved if the old guy had at least managed to complete his quest. Simply put, the guys in question were more revolting than most of the serial killers encountered up until this point. This because they were perfectly lucid and conscious of what they were doing, not acting out of trauma. And also because what they did to that girl was much worse than simply killing her (it might have been almost an act of mercy): they destroyed her physically and emotionally, all the while laughing and jocking, and led her to plead to be left go, then to be left to die, then to kill herself, to be torn apart, to be physically shredded to pieces).
Like(0)Reply
Click images below, Turn to Right directionChange